“A Lawyer’s Case for the Resurrection, Pt. 2” – The Defense Rests

The Defense Rests Podcast with Abdu Murray

Click above to listen to The Defense Rests

[Abdu] discusses how the Christian can meet the burden of proof, then shift that burden to the skeptic to try to explain what happened to Jesus.  Remember, each side is responsible to present explanations, not just the Christian.

Hey TD!

During the first episode of The Defense Rests, Michigan Super Lawyer and RZIM apologist, Abdu Murray, laid the groundwork for an essential component of ANY trial: burdens of proof.  If you haven’t heard this, you need to:

The Defense Rests: Burdens of Proof

Abdu takes the stand in the next two episodes, A Lawyer’s Case for the Resurrection, to argue for the resurrection of Christ. In the first episode, he explains the differences between “circumstantial evidence” and “direct evidence.” It includes Abdu’s “CASE” acronym setting out four key facts about the historical Jesus that the vast majority of scholars agree on. Abdu argues that Jesus’ resurrection from the dead best explains the facts.

The Defense Rests: A Lawyer’s Case for the Resurrection, Pt. 1

This this second episode, Abdu continues the CASE acronym, specifically the S and E, to establish that Jesus really did rise from the dead.  He discusses how the Christian can meet the burden of proof, then shift that burden to the skeptic to try to explain what happened to Jesus.  Remember, each side is responsible to present explanations, not just the Christian.

The Defense Rests: A Lawyer’s Case for the Resurrection, Pt. 2

In a clear and understandable way, Abdu treats the listener as the jury as he explains the application of law and rules of evidence as they pertain to oft-debated Christian, as well as atheistic propositions, allowing you to come up with your own verdict.

Listen well and use this time of quarantine to equip and strengthen your reasoning and clarity of thought!

“A Lawyer’s Case for the Resurrection, Pt. 1” – The Defense Rests

The Defense Rests Podcast with Abdu Murray

Click above to listen to The Defense Rests

Hey TD!

During the first episode of The Defense Rests, Michigan Super Lawyer and RZIM apologist, Abdu Murray, laid the groundwork for an essential component of ANY trial: burdens of proof.  If you haven’t heard this, you need to:

The Defense Rests: Burdens of Proof

In this episode, Abdu takes the stand to argue for the resurrection of Christ.  He explains the differences between “circumstantial evidence” and “direct evidence.” It includes Abdu’s “CASE” acronym setting out four key facts about the historical Jesus that the vast majority of scholars agree on. Abdu argues that Jesus’ resurrection from the dead best explains the facts.

In a clear and understandable way, Abdu treats the listener as the jury as he explains the application of law and rules of evidence as they pertain to oft-debated Christian, as well as atheistic propositions, allowing you to come up with your own verdict.

Listen well and use this time of quarantine to equip and strengthen your reasoning and clarity of thought!

God’s Existence: Who Holds the Burden of Proof – Theist or Atheist?

The Defense Rests Podcast with Abdu Murray

Click above to listen to The Defense Rests

Hey TD!

If you were at the Virtual TD meeting last Friday, you heard that I went to law school for a year.  Perhaps it was a prelude to my son being the lawyer that he is today!

My experience in law school was valuable for a number of reason, not the least of which is how it has helped me in my Christian walk.  Listening to the podcast, The Defense Rests, by RZIM Vice President and former Michigan Super Lawyer, Abdu Murray, was like going back to law school.

In a clear and understandable way, Abdu treats the listener as the jury as he explains the application of law and rules of evidence as they pertain to oft-debated Christian, as well as atheistic propositions, allowing you to come up with your own verdict.

In this first podcast episode, Abdu takes the time to explain a huge fundamental component of any trial: the burdens of proof.

This is huge because every conversation you have with someone about the Lord is a trial of some sort, where God is on trial and you are responsible for keeping the conversation truthful, objective, fair-handed and conducive for the evidence to emerge.  This podcast will help you in that endeavor, as it isn’t always easy to do, especially if things get heated.

TD’ers, I highly encourage you to listen well and internalize this profitable lesson in law!

– Arthur

RZIM @ UC Berkeley: Clarity in a Culture of Confusion

RZIM’s Abdu Murray & Nathan Betts @ UC Berkeley

Hey TD!

Earlier this week, RZIM joined with the Veritas Forum to hold various open forums on pertinent issues of our day on the campus of UC Berkeley.  One of the forums was on Clarity in a Culture of Confusion and was led by Abdu Murray, who was then joined by Nathan Betts during the Q&A.

Abdu gives a compelling talk, which was followed by Q&A. I found the questions to be quite thoughtful and relevant, and thought you would get a lot out of it.

Here’s the legend of questions:

– In the multi-cultural metropolis that is the Bay Area and UC Berkeley, which is a microcosm of that, how do you balance a desire and celebration of diversity with the exclusive nature of truth? – 56:35

– Living in such a secular society, how do we effectively engage with non-Christians in a way that isn’t a debate, but more of a loving conversation? – 1:06.22

– We stand for great diversity on this campus and love it that this campus accepts all kinds of people, from every walk of life.  Why is it that challenging questions like, What does it mean to be human? What does it mean to be male or female? What does it mean to be a good citizen?, isn’t valid in light of an exclusive truth? Is there are value to asking questions that only seem to have fuzzy answers that don’t exactly fit with the worldview you’re positing?   – 1:12.26

– How do you reconcile conflicting viewpoints between science and religion? What makes religion more true than modern science? – 1:25.03

– Are there limitations to Christian truth? Are truth and answers the same thing, and if so, does the Christian worldview offer an answer to every question in modern society? – 1:29.28

– Does the Christian worldview offer a resolution to the human condition? – mental disorders/gender dysphoria/disease – is the Christian worldview actually a resolution for those issues? – 1:38.30

– You’ve argued compellingly that truth is important, but it doesn’t seem it will help us very much unless we can access truth.  There are a lot of impediments to doing that – we’re bound inside human minds and cultures with an overload of information. Please speak to that. – 1:45.16